Skip to content

Conversation

@Shilpa-Gokul
Copy link
Contributor

@Shilpa-Gokul Shilpa-Gokul commented Jun 11, 2025

Redact the new bearerToken printed as part of TestContext from CI runs

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 11, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Shilpa-Gokul: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57334, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@Shilpa-Gokul
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 11, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Shilpa-Gokul: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57334, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 11, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and sjenning June 11, 2025 12:38
@Shilpa-Gokul
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@Shilpa-Gokul
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@Shilpa-Gokul
Copy link
Contributor Author

Verified that the token is redacted by testing locally

[root@C155F2U33 scripts]# ./openshift-tests run-test "[sig-imageregistry][Feature:ImageExtract] Image extract should extract content from an image [apigroup:image.openshift.io] [Skipped:Disconnected] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
I0612 02:49:22.139021 3133625 factory.go:193] Registered Plugin "containerd"
openshift-tests v0.0.0-unknown-a151bc459a
INFO[0000] Decoding provider                             clusterState="<nil>" discover=false dryRun=false func=DecodeProvider providerType=
  I0612 02:49:22.209335 3133625 test_setup.go:94] Extended test version v0.0.0-unknown-a151bc459a
  I0612 02:49:22.209381 3133625 test_context.go:558] Tolerating taints "node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane" when considering if nodes are ready
  I0612 02:49:22.212748 3133625 framework.go:2317] microshift-version configmap not found
  I0612 02:49:22.212915 3133625 command.go:61] Loaded test configuration: &framework.TestContextType{KubeConfig:"/home/keerthana/libvirt-config/upi-install/upi/auth/kubeconfig", KubeContext:"", KubeAPIContentType:"application/vnd.kubernetes.protobuf", KubeletRootDir:"/var/lib/kubelet", KubeletConfigDropinDir:"", CertDir:"", Host:"https://api.testsg.tt.testing:6443", BearerToken: <redacted> , RepoRoot:"../../", ListImages:false, listTests:false, listLabels:false, ListConformanceTests:false, Provider:"skeleton", Tooling:"", timeouts:framework.TimeoutContext{Poll:2000000000, PodStart:300000000000, PodStartShort:120000000000, PodStartSlow:900000000000, PodDelete:300000000000, ClaimProvision:300000000000, DataSourceProvision:300000000000, ClaimProvisionShort:60000000000, ClaimBound:180000000000, PVReclaim:180000000000, PVBound:180000000000, PVCreate:180000000000, PVDelete:300000000000, PVDeleteSlow:1200000000000, SnapshotCreate:300000000000, SnapshotDelete:300000000000, SnapshotControllerMetrics:300000000000, SystemPodsStartup:600000000000, NodeSchedulable:1800000000000, SystemDaemonsetStartup:300000000000, NodeNotReady:180000000000}, CloudConfig:framework.CloudConfig{APIEndpoint:"", ProjectID:"", Zone:"", Zones:[]string{}, Region:"", MultiZone:false, MultiMaster:true, Cluster:"", MasterName:"", NodeInstanceGroup:"", NumNodes:3, ClusterIPRange:"", ClusterTag:"", Network:"", ConfigFile:"", NodeTag:"", MasterTag:"", Provider:framework.NullProvider{}}, KubectlPath:"kubectl", OutputDir:"/tmp", ReportDir:"", ReportPrefix:"", ReportCompleteGinkgo:false, ReportCompleteJUnit:false, Prefix:"e2e", MinStartupPods:-1, EtcdUpgradeStorage:"", EtcdUpgradeVersion:"", GCEUpgradeScript:"", ContainerRuntimeEndpoint:"unix:///run/containerd/containerd.sock", ContainerRuntimeProcessName:"containerd", ContainerRuntimePidFile:"/run/containerd/containerd.pid", SystemdServices:"containerd*", DumpSystemdJournal:false, ImageServiceEndpoint:"", MasterOSDistro:"custom", NodeOSDistro:"custom", NodeOSArch:"amd64", VerifyServiceAccount:true, DeleteNamespace:true, DeleteNamespaceOnFailure:true, AllowedNotReadyNodes:-1, CleanStart:false, GatherKubeSystemResourceUsageData:"false", GatherLogsSizes:false, GatherMetricsAfterTest:"false", GatherSuiteMetricsAfterTest:false, MaxNodesToGather:0, IncludeClusterAutoscalerMetrics:false, OutputPrintType:"json", CreateTestingNS:(framework.CreateTestingNSFn)(0x15a1f920), DumpLogsOnFailure:true, DisableLogDump:false, LogexporterGCSPath:"", NodeTestContextType:framework.NodeTestContextType{NodeE2E:false, NodeName:"", NodeConformance:false, PrepullImages:false, ImageDescription:"", RuntimeConfig:map[string]string(nil), SystemSpecName:"", RestartKubelet:false, ExtraEnvs:map[string]string(nil), StandaloneMode:false, CriProxyEnabled:false}, ClusterDNSDomain:"cluster.local", NodeKiller:framework.NodeKillerConfig{Enabled:false, FailureRatio:0.01, Interval:60000000000, JitterFactor:60, SimulatedDowntime:600000000000, NodeKillerStopCtx:context.Context(nil), NodeKillerStop:(func())(nil)}, IPFamily:"ipv4", NonblockingTaints:"node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane", ProgressReportURL:"", SriovdpConfigMapFile:"", SpecSummaryOutput:"", DockerConfigFile:"", E2EDockerConfigFile:"", KubeTestRepoList:"", SnapshotControllerPodName:"", SnapshotControllerHTTPPort:0, RequireDevices:false, EnabledVolumeDrivers:[]string(nil)}

@Shilpa-Gokul
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@Shilpa-Gokul
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@Shilpa-Gokul
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-trt
Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Jun 17, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: a151bc4

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling Low
[bz-Cloud Compute] clusteroperator/control-plane-machine-set should not change condition/Degraded
This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:azure SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.

Open Bugs
etcd-scaling jobs failing ~60% of the time
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-disruptive IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (19) are below the historical average (1140): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-fips-serial-1of2 IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (18) are below the historical average (1403): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-fips-serial-2of2 IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (18) are below the historical average (1430): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (18) are below the historical average (1343): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling Low
[sig-api-machinery] disruption/cache-kube-api apiserver/kube-apiserver connection/new should be available throughout the test
This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:vsphere SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.
---
[bz-Cloud Compute] clusteroperator/control-plane-machine-set should not change condition/Degraded
This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:vsphere SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.

Open Bugs
etcd-scaling jobs failing ~60% of the time
---
[sig-api-machinery] disruption/openshift-api apiserver/openshift-apiserver connection/new should be available throughout the test
This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:vsphere SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.
---
[sig-api-machinery] disruption/oauth-api apiserver/oauth-apiserver connection/new should be available throughout the test
This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:vsphere SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.
---
Showing 4 of 5 test results

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Shilpa-Gokul: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57334, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

In response to this:

Redact the new bearerToken printed as part of TestContext from CI runs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@tvardema
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 27, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 2, 2025
@bplaxco
Copy link

bplaxco commented Jul 2, 2025

Can't speak to the integration but the regarding the regex:

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 2, 2025

@bplaxco: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to this:

Can't speak to the integration but the regarding the regex:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@Shilpa-Gokul
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@tvardema
Copy link
Contributor

tvardema commented Jul 7, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 7, 2025
@Shilpa-Gokul
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@alokgoswami-ag
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@alokgoswami-ag
Copy link
Contributor

/test verify

@openshift-trt
Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Oct 22, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 2178917

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-fips IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (22) are below the historical average (3230): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2 IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (21) are below the historical average (1816): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2 IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (21) are below the historical average (1744): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-csi IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (22) are below the historical average (1803): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (21) are below the historical average (1831): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

@alokgoswami-ag
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@openshift-trt
Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Oct 23, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 2178917

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-fips IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (26) are below the historical average (3277): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2 IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (25) are below the historical average (1836): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR.
Please ensure that new tests meet guidelines for naming and stability.

New Test Risks for sha: 2178917

Job Name New Test Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-microshift High - "Import the release payload "nightly-arm64" from an external source" is a new test that was not present in all runs against the current commit.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial High - "Import the release payload "nightly-arm64" from an external source" is a new test that was not present in all runs against the current commit.

New tests seen in this PR at sha: 2178917

  • "Import the release payload "nightly-arm64" from an external source" [Total: 4, Pass: 4, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]

@openshift-trt
Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Oct 23, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 2178917

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-fips IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (26) are below the historical average (3266): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2 IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (25) are below the historical average (1829): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR.
Please ensure that new tests meet guidelines for naming and stability.

New Test Risks for sha: 2178917

Job Name New Test Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-microshift High - "Import the release payload "nightly-arm64" from an external source" is a new test that was not present in all runs against the current commit.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial High - "Import the release payload "nightly-arm64" from an external source" is a new test that was not present in all runs against the current commit.

New tests seen in this PR at sha: 2178917

  • "Import the release payload "nightly-arm64" from an external source" [Total: 4, Pass: 4, Fail: 0, Flake: 0]

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 24, 2025

@Shilpa-Gokul: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback a151bc4 link false /test 4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback
ci/prow/okd-e2e-gcp b238a93 link false /test okd-e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-publicnet-1of2 b238a93 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-publicnet-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling b238a93 link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling b238a93 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-hypershift-conformance b238a93 link false /test e2e-hypershift-conformance
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade b238a93 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws b238a93 link false /test e2e-aws
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-serial b238a93 link false /test e2e-openstack-serial
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-fips-serial-2of2 b238a93 link false /test e2e-gcp-fips-serial-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-publicnet-2of2 b238a93 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-publicnet-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive b238a93 link false /test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade b238a93 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-proxy b238a93 link false /test e2e-aws-proxy
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6 b238a93 link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout b238a93 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling b238a93 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-fips-serial-1of2 b238a93 link false /test e2e-gcp-fips-serial-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling b238a93 link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-disruptive b238a93 link false /test e2e-gcp-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-azure b238a93 link false /test e2e-azure
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones 802f5ec link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade 802f5ec link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node 802f5ec link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial 802f5ec link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn 802f5ec link false /test e2e-openstack-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout 802f5ec link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 2178917 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Member

@smg247 smg247 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 24, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 24, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bplaxco, Shilpa-Gokul, smg247, tvardema

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 24, 2025
@alokgoswami-ag
Copy link
Contributor

/verified later @alokgoswami-ag

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added verified-later verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria labels Oct 27, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@alokgoswami-ag: This PR has been marked to be verified later by @alokgoswami-ag.

In response to this:

/verified later @alokgoswami-ag

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 5d46d82 and 2 for PR HEAD 4010e5b in total

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 32a91eb into openshift:main Oct 27, 2025
20 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@Shilpa-Gokul: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57334: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

This pull request has the verified-later tag and will need to be manually moved to VERIFIED after testing. Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57334 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Redact the new bearerToken printed as part of TestContext from CI runs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@alokgoswami-ag
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick release-4.19

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@alokgoswami-ag: #29912 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.19":

Applying: OCPBUGS-57334: Redact bearertoken in TestContext
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	pkg/cmd/openshift-tests/run-upgrade/options.go
M	pkg/test/extensions/binary.go
M	test/extended/util/client.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging test/extended/util/client.go
Auto-merging pkg/test/extensions/binary.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in pkg/test/extensions/binary.go
Auto-merging pkg/cmd/openshift-tests/run-upgrade/options.go
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 OCPBUGS-57334: Redact bearertoken in TestContext

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@alokgoswami-ag
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick release-4.20

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@alokgoswami-ag: new pull request created: #30435

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria verified-later

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants